The following is the third
  excerpt from my recent interview with The American Herald Tribune. The
  subject is the growing influence and power of Neocons in US government, and
  the nature of the Trump regime and the constitutional and economic crisis to
  which it is inevitably leading. 
Mohsen
  Abdelmoumen: 
How to explain why the influence of neocons in the US
  continues despite changes in presidents and administrations? 
Jack
  Rasmus: 
The neocons represent a particular right wing radical social
  and political base in America that has existed for some time. In fact, it’s
  always been there, going back at least to McCarthyism in the early 1950s, and
  even before. This is a radical ideological right, even pro- or proto-fascism
  base in the US. It was checked by the great depression and world war II
  temporarily but quickly arose again in the late 1940s with the advent of the
  cold war and China’s successful war for independence. It formed around Barry
  Goldwater in the 1960s. It arose again in the 1970s with Nixon.When Nixon was
  thrown out, it reorganized and set forth a plan to take over the American
  government and political institutions.It even developed position papers and
  internal proposals how this takeover might be achieved. Ideologues like Dick
  Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and others assumed positions of power in the Reagan
  administration. Their movement took over the US House of Representatives in
  1994 and vowed to create a dysfunctional government that would be blamed for
  gridlock and give their more radical proposals a hearing as to how to break
  the gridlock and govern again in their interests. We saw them reassert their
  influence when Cheney was made vice president in 2000. He was actually a
  co-president, and perhaps more, as George W. Bush, was the publicized
  president but really a playboy figurehead. Cheney and his radical right ran
  foreign policy, giving us Iraq and setting the entire Middle East afire in
  its wake.This radical right is also behind the decline of democratic and
  civil rights since 2000, using the 9-11 events as excuse to push their
  anti-democratic agenda. The Koch brothers, the Adelman and Mercer families,
  and scores of others are the moneybags in their ranks.They funded the
  teaparty movement that has since entered the Republican party, terrorized the
  party’s moderates and driven them out of office and the party itself. Without
  them, their money, their grass roots organizations, their control now of
  scores of states’ legislatures, their stacking of judgeships across the
  country, the Trump phenomenon would not have been possible in 2016.
  Ideologues like Steve Bannon, John Bolton, Navarro, Abrams, Miller and others
  are now running the Trump administration and its domestic (immigration) and
  foreign (trade fights, Israel, No. Korea, Venezuela, Iran) policies. 
The point is they’ve always been there, a current in US
  politics below the radar, but since 1994 aggressively asserting itself and
  penetrating US institutions with increasing success—aided by media like Fox
  News and their analogues in radio and on the internet. 
Mohsen
  Abdelmoumen: 
Trump made promises of employment during his election campaign
  and was elected on the slogan "America first" by the disadvantaged
  classes, especially in rural areas. Isn't Donald Trump the president of the
  rich in the United States? What is your assessment of Trump's governance? 
Jack
  Rasmus: 
That assessment must first distinguish between governance in
  the interest of whom? It’s been a disaster for working-class America. All
  Trump’s promises of bringing jobs back is just a manipulation of concerns by
  workers of massive job losses and wage stagnation due to offshoring of US
  jobs and free trade. While Trump talks of bringing jobs back, he opens the
  floodgates to skilled foreign engineers and workers taking more jobs based on
  H1-B and L-1 visas, covered up by cuts to unskilled workers entering from
  Central America. 
Trump is a free trader, just a bilateral free trader not a
  multilateral one. Trump’s trade offensive is about the US reasserting its
  hegemony in global markets and trade for another decade as the global economy
  weakens. It’s a phony trade war against US allies. Just look at the deals
  made with South Korea, the exemptions given for steel and aluminum tariffs,
  the go slow and go soft with Japan and Europe. Contrast that with the increasingly
  aggressive attack on China trade relations—which is really about the US
  trying to stop next generation technology development by China in AI, cyber
  security, and 5G wireless. These are technologies that are also the military
  technologies of the 2020s. The neocons and military industrial complex in the
  US, along with the Pentagon and key pro-military chairpersons in Congress,
  want to stop China’s tech development. It’s really a two country race in tech
  now, with almost all the patents roughly equally issued by China and the US
  and everyone else way behind. So the trade war has delivered nothing for the
  working classes except rising prices now, and even for farmers who are the
  losers (but they’re given direct subsidies to offset their losses, unlike working
  families that have to bear the brunt of the tariff effects). 
Look at the tax legislation of 2018 and the deregulation
  actions of 2017 by Trump. Who benefited. Business got big cost cuts. The rest
  of us got higher taxes to offset the $4 trillion actual Trump tax cuts for
  business and investors and wealthy households.US multinational corps got $2
  trillion of that $4 trillion. And households will have to pay $1.5 trillion
  in more taxes, starting this year and accelerating by 2025. In deregulation,
  we get the collapse of Obamacare and accelerating premiums, while the bankers
  got financial regulations of 2008-10 repealed. As far as political
  ‘governance’ is concerned, what we’ve seen under Trump is widespread voter
  suppression, gerrymandering by his ‘red states’ to help him get re-elected
  next time, the approval of two conservative judges to the US Supreme court
  engineered by Trump’s puppy, McConnell, in the Senate. Then there’s the now
  emerging attacks on immigrants, including jailing their kids, and the attacks
  on womens’ rights that was once considered unimaginable. 
Politically Trump has been engineering a bona fide
  constitutional crisis. He’s appeared to have gotten away with the Mueller
  investigation which should have led to his impeachment but hasn’t. He
  continually undermines US political institutions verbally. He clearly is
  moving toward bypassing Congress and governing directly by ‘national
  emergency’ declarations, refusing to allow executive branch employees to
  testify to Congress despite subpoenas, ordering the launching of a new
  McCarthyism by ordering his Justice dept. to start investigating opponents,
  etc.—i.e. all of which were the basis of Nixon’s impeachment. 
In short, Trump’s governance has been a disaster for
  working-class America, immigrants of color, small farmers and even
  manufacturing companies, but a boon to far right and white nationalists whom
  he publicly supports. It’s been especially beneficial to wealthy households,
  businesses and investors, moreover. And maybe that’s the most important
  reason why the capitalists still tolerate him and let him remain in office.
  If they really wanted to impeach and remove him from office they could find a
  way. But he’s delivering for them financially and economically. He’s ‘good
  for business’, in other words. But so was Hitler. 
  | 
 
dimanche 16 juin 2019
Inscription à :
Publier les commentaires (Atom)
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire