Marx, Trump and the republic for which we stand

HOME > ARTICLE > MARX, TRUMP AND THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH WE STAND

EmailShare



BY:SCOTT HILEY| SEPTEMBER 25, 2018




Capital demands absolute power over labor and total submission to the need for growth and profits. Capitalism is chaotic and often violent, and a quick glance at the history of Latin America or Africa reminds us that the capitalist class has no problem with dictators, provided they keep the profits flowing.

So in light of the violent and authoritarian nature of capitalism, why have advanced capitalist states tended to adopt the form called the republic: a representative democracy based on limited and distributed power, multiple parties, checks and balances, and adherence to a written constitution? Why isn’t fascism the default setting for capitalist power?

Today, we are faced with a president who lost the popular vote but claims a mandate to rule by executive order, silence opposition media, and persecute political opponents. In these circumstances, that question of political democracy in the capitalist republic takes on new urgency.

Are the institutions of the republic a guarantee of democracy or a sham?

On the one hand, the ruling class tells us that the institutions of the republic are a guarantee of democracy. On the other, self-proclaimed radicals tell us that those institutions are a sham–at best, irrelevant to real democracy; at worst, a dangerous illusion meant to keep us happy in our chains.

Both of these answers ring false. Neither captures the struggle for democracy led by workers and oppressed people within the capitalist republic, a struggle that includes victories as well as defeats and deflections. We have to account for both slavery and Reconstruction, both the NLRA and Janus, both the Trump regime and a resistance poised to turn the tide against the neo-Confederate GOP.

So if the republic is something less than the bulwark of democracy and something more than the star-spangled glove hiding the iron fist of capital, what is it–and why does it matter to the working class?

The republic as political technology

We get closer to the point if we think of the institutions of the republic as one of the great technologies of capitalism–something like the factory system and the assembly line, or information technologies and social media. Each of these technologies vastly expanded capitalist accumulation and exploitation. At the same time, however, each one created new possibilities for (and placed new demands on) working class organization.

By bringing workers together and harnessing their joint labor-power to machines, the factory system increased productivity and the profits of the capitalist class–but it also gave birth to the trade union, as workers’ common struggle brought them together despite differences of nationality, race, and language. Now, social media platforms turn our human drive for sociability into a source of profits for shareholders, colonizing our entire life as a source of surplus value–but they also generate new modes of political organization and lower the barriers to ideological work. Even as they strengthened capital, each of these technologies generated new and amplified forms of class struggle, along with new tools with which to join that struggle.

The rule of law contains intra-class struggles within a set of predictable rules.

The republic is no different. As the array of reactions to the Trump regime and its policies show, the capitalist class is not homogeneous. Different sections have divergent material interests and conflicting political strategies for pursuing them. In the face of this chaotic inner life, the institutions of the republic offer a good way of regulating internal conflict in the interest of preserving power. A multi-party state allows the regulation of factional struggles as political contests between parties. Separation of powers, backed by checks and balances, means that control of one branch of government is separate from control of the state, thereby facilitating power-sharing among different sections of the bourgeoisie. The rule of law, managed by an legally/formally independent judiciary, contains intra-class struggles within a set of predictable rules.



Just like the assembly line or Facebook, however, the republic also opened a new terrain of democratic struggle, including class struggle. That struggle has centered, historically, on the expansion of the right to vote and the attempt to turn victories won through mass mobilization into durable legal gains. Its victories include Reconstruction amendments, the 19th Amendment, the National Labor Relations Act, the New Deal reforms, the Civil Rights Act, and Supreme Court decisions like Brown v. Topeka (school integration), Roe v. Wade (reproductive freedom) and Obergefell v. Hodges (marriage equality). Those victories were possible because the forces that won them understood the importance of judicial appointments, legislative majorities, and the electoral work the produces them.

The republic is an important terrain of democratic and class struggle.

On the other side of that struggle, the current Trump-GOP agenda reads like a line-by-line reversal of those democratic gains: attacks on birthright citizenship, equal protection, collective bargaining, social welfare programs, public education, voting rights, reproductive freedom, and LGBTQ equality. That agenda, too–even more than the left’s–is the product of a decades-long electoral campaign to create Republican majorities at every level and to put the Republican Party under the most reactionary control possible.

For the immediate future, therefore, the republic is an important terrain of democratic and class struggle. The 2018 midterms are an opportunity to break the Trump-GOP stranglehold, place an obstacle to the rightward swing of our political life, and open a space within the republic for the left and progressive forces who have gathered under the banner of the resistance to the Trump regime.



The republic beyond capitalism

Thus far, I have approached the institutions of the republic as an arena of struggle–one of capitalism’s contradictions, a capitalist technology that pushes the working class to build its unity and political independence. But saying that capitalism produces its own gravediggers does not mean that we can lay down our shovels and wait for it to die in its sleep.

The republic is more than a terrain on which we fight. Like the factory, or like a social media platform, it is also an object of class struggle. This is the fundamental insight Marx reached in his analysis of the revolution in France in 1848. Inspired by the revolution of 1789, the insurgent workers of Paris demanded, and won, a republic–only to see the bourgeoisie take it over and turn it into an instrument of repression. Today, the fight for democracy within the capitalist republic is part of a larger fight over what class controls the institutions of the republic, who those institutions serve, and how they work.

That fight goes beyond “defending the republic” or preserving a pre-Trump status quo. Changing what class holds power must, and will, change how power is organized. Our work pushes beyond capitalism, toward the day when (to paraphrase Marx) the red flag of the republic of labor flies over city hall. That workers’ republic will be different from the one we know, but the struggle for democracy–at every moment, in every forum, with every resource at our disposal–is how we get there.

Image: Creative Commons 3.0.
Tags:
2018 midterm elections
authoritarianism
Communist Party USA
democracy
Marxism
voting rights

AUTHOR


SCOTT HILEYView Profile

Scott Hiley has taught French, literature, history, and philosophy at the high school, college, and post-graduate levels. A member of CPUSA since 2010, he is active in struggles against austerity and for education justice and labor rights. His articles have appeared in the People's World (US), the Morning Star (UK), and l'Humanité (France). He lives in a rural town in upstate NY.

COMMENTS (1)

BETH EDELMAN | SEPTEMBER 28, 2018 AT 6:49 PM

At this moment a fight of significant proportions is raging. The Kavanaugh confirmation process is big time being penetrated by the democratic movement, first place the women’s movement. No guarantees on the outcome- every fight has it’s consequences, as my friend Tom often discusses- the working class and democratic movement are gaining new experience and new muscle and the big one for this year- 2018 Mid-term election in less than 40 days away. a great article


Reply


LEAVE A COMMENT

Your Weekend Briefing By JOUMANA KHATIB AND ASHLEY CALLOWAY-BLATCH Good morning, and welcome to the last weekend of 2018. Here are the week’s top stories, and a look ahead. Guillermo Arias/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images 1. President Trump stuck to his demands for border wall funding as the government shutdown entered its first full week, and he threatened to close down the southern border if the “obstructionist Democrats” didn’t budge. The impasse will be the first major challenge for the incoming speaker, Nancy Pelosi of California, as the Democrats take control of the House next week. And federal workers, 800,000 of whom are furloughed or working without pay, are beginning to get anxious about the prospect of a protracted shutdown. “This one feels different,” said one T.S.A. officer who was worried about her mortgage and medical expenses. In another push for his wall, Mr. Trump on Saturday blamed Democrats for the deaths of two migrant children in U.S. custody; an 8-year-old boy died on Dec. 24, and a 7-year-old girl died three weeks earlier. The president said people were making the arduous journeys to the border because of “pathetic” immigration policies. “If we had a wall, they wouldn’t even try!” he tweeted. Above, a migrant looks from Tijuana, Mexico, into San Diego County. Have you been keeping up with the headlines? Test your knowledge with our news quiz. And here’s the front page of our Sunday paper, the Sunday Review from Opinion and our crossword puzzles. ____ Al Drago for The New York Times 2. In his first visit to troops stationed in a combat zone, President Trump, above, went to see American forces in Iraq on Wednesday. He was met with a standing ovation from about 100 American servicewomen and men at Al Asad Air Base, some of them wearing “Make America Great Again” caps. The president singled out people wearing the caps and accused Democrats of being weak on border security, leading some to criticize Mr. Trump for turning the visit into “a campaign rally.” During the visit, Mr. Trump defended his intention to pull U.S. forces from foreign wars in Syria and Afghanistan, saying that “the United States cannot continue to be the policeman of the world.” Mr. Trump’s abrupt decision to withdraw the troops has managed to unite the left and right against his plans, our White House correspondent writes. ____ Janie Osborne for The New York Times 3. The Trump administration on Friday proposed major changes to the way the federal government calculates the benefits of restricting mercury emissions from coal-burning power plants. The Environmental Protection Agency, using a different formula, declared that the federal rules imposed on mercury by the Obama administration are too costly to justify. Above, a coal-fired plant in Sidney, Mont. In just two years, President Trump has unleashed a regulatory rollback with little parallel in the past half-century. The trade-offs, while often out of the glare of Washington, are frighteningly real for the health and safety of people around the country. We took an up-close look at four places in the U.S. where Mr. Trump’s retreat on the environment is unfolding in consequential ways. ____ Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times 4. Stocks rose or fell sharply for most of the holiday week, sometimes doing both in the same day. The raucous week on Wall Street ended quietly on Friday, as stocks drifted between gains and losses before closing slightly lower. Above, outside the New York Stock Exchange. Most of the seesawing can be attributed to lighter-than-usual volume, which is typical for a holiday week, but volatility has become a hallmark of trading lately. Shares experienced their steepest drop in several weeks on Monday as investors worried over President Trump’s attacks on the Federal Reserve. Both the treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, and the president’s incoming chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, have tried to assure the public that Mr. Trump does not intend to fire Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chairman. ____ Clockwise from top left: SSPL/Getty Images; Hulton Archive/Getty Images; Agence France-Presse — Getty Images; Penguin; Fred Stein Archive, via Getty Images 5. For the first time in 20 years, a large pool of literary works will lose their copyrighted status and enter the public domain. That means books will likely be cheaper, and artists can create new works based on classic stories without fear of an intellectual property lawsuit. In other words: Make way for the fan fiction. Some publishers are worried about the change, and stand to lose money. But for readers, experts say, the additions will be a huge boon. Thousands of artists and writers — including Kahlil Gibran, Zelda Fitzgerald, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Agatha Christie, Jean Toomer and Thomas Mann, pictured clockwise from left — will have their work enter the public domain. ____ Tyler Hicks/The New York Times 6. There was a shake-up in Saudi Arabia’s government: King Salman of Saudi Arabia named new ministers and security chiefs while keeping power firmly in the hands of his son, Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Many of those promoted are close associates of the crown prince, who already has near-total control of the kingdom. Why it matters: Western intelligence agencies have concluded that Prince Mohammed knew about and most likely ordered the killing of the Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi in October. And the crown prince has directed the Saudi military campaign in Yemen that has contributed to a humanitarian crisis and drawn growing opposition in the West. The Saudis say they are battling to rescue Yemen from a hostile faction backed by Iran. But to do it, the Saudis have used their vast oil wealth to outsource the war, mainly by hiring what Sudanese soldiers say are tens of thousands of desperate survivors of the conflict in Darfur to fight, many of them children. Above, Sudanese soldiers in Hudaydah, Yemen. ____ Benjamin Rasmussen for The New York Times 7. The end of the year is always a great time for reflection. At The Times, we highlighted 18 people who left indelible impressions on both our readers and journalists in 2018, including a woman battling the severe addiction crisis in her community and a man, above, fighting efforts to weaken the Native American vote in Utah. We also have six athletes who changed the game this year, and a few notable moments from 2018 when the internet was actually funny. ____ Seth Wenig/Associated Press 8. Not one of the million people expected to show up in Times Square this year? Stay in with a novel recommended by one of our Book Review editors, and perhaps look wistfully at scenes of Times Square from past New Years celebrations. Or you can follow the process of getting 3,000 pounds of confetti to drop on Times Square, above, on New Year’s, starting with Jan. 1, when applications go out for next year’s Confetti Crew. ____ Artwork by Deborah Roberts 9. Finally, no matter how you’re ringing in the new year, don’t miss our best Weekend Reads. This week, we have our annual “The Lives They Lived” features, where writers pay tribute to the artists, innovators and thinkers who died this year. We also have features on the relentlessness of modern parenting, Lin-Manual Miranda’s passion for Puerto Rico and more. Have a wonderful end of the year, and best wishes for 2019. Your Weekend Briefing is published Sundays at 6 a.m. Eastern. You can sign up here to get our Morning Briefings by email in the Australian, Asian, European or American morning, or here to receive an Evening Briefing on U.S. weeknights. Browse our full range of Times newsletters here. What did you like? What do you want to see here? Let us know at briefing@nytimes.com.

LIKE THIS EMAIL? Forward it to your friends, and let them know they can sign up here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsor a Subscription Inspire a future generation of readers by contributing to The New York Times sponsor-a-subscription program. For every subscription granted through contributions to this program, The Times will provide a digital subscription to one additional student.

FOLLOW NYTimes FACEBOOK @nytimes Get more NYTimes.com newsletters » | Sign Up for the Evening Briefing newsletter »

ABOUT THIS EMAIL You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Morning Briefing newsletter. Unsubscribe | Manage Subscriptions | Change Your Email | Privacy Policy | Contact | Advertise Copyright 2018 The New York Times Company 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018