Aleppo: a paradise to be for the
Syrian people
A sour and
humiliating defeat for US imperialism
By Daniel
Paquet dpaquet1871@gmail.com
The right and
far-right are completely abashed. They,
with the terrorists formed in the West (Daesh, in Arabic), lost a dramatic war
against the Syrian government and foremost the peaceful people of this country. They lost grip of Aleppo, the largest city in
Syria.
“We may be
returning to that earlier (Western invasion, -Ed.), multipolar world. China is now a superpower, and just starting
to test its new muscle. Russia is newly
aggressive. “[1]
We should
underline that “the Canadian financial system could be exposed to stress
emanating from China and other emerging-market economies (EMEs). A disorderly depreciation of EME currencies,
for example, could lead to the default of corporate or sovereign debt denominated
in US dollars, which would weigh on global economic growth and trade. A resulting further reduction in commodity
prices could lead to significant volatility across financial markets, which
would spill over to the Canadian economy and financial system. This risk continues to be rated as
‘elevated.’ Considerable uncertainty remains
around the structural transformation of China’s economy and financial
system. Chinese economy growth continues
to slow modestly toward a more sustainable pace, but activity is still being buoyed
by high and growing leverage. High indebtedness
is a vulnerability, particularly if growth were to weaken more quickly than
expected or interest rates were to rise sharply. In particular, high corporate leverage in
China, especially in uncompetitive industries such as steel and coal, may
complicate the transformation of China’s economy and financial sector. The nature of and interlinkages between the
banking and shadow banking systems are also becoming more complex and opaque,
increasing the underlying credit risk.
The renewed strength of the US dollar could prove problematic for
emerging markets. It could cause stress
for firms with large unhedged US-dollar debts or lead to disorderly capital
outflows from these countries. There is
evidence, however that firms have begun to reduce their exposure to currency
risk.” [2]
In fact, we
need to make such a difference between and EMEs since Arab countries for
example are already engaged in capitalist development since years, especially
because of their fossil resources (oil).
“In the
Middle East, regional powers, like Turkey and Iran, have increasing influence –
Iran may hold more say in Syria than any other country. Relatively speaking, America is no longer
nearly as powerful as it appeared to be after 1989. (…) The Obama
administration’s reluctance to bomb the Assad regime, or to impose a no-fly zone
early in the Syrian Arab Spring, reflects not just reluctance about risking
conflict with Moscow or Tehran. It also reflects American’s earlier Middle
Eastern disasters. Those calling on
America to intervene militarily in a Mideast crisis forget that America’s
recent Mideast interventions have all ended very badly.”[3]
“The
decision by the United States (and Canada) to avoid a full-scale military
intervention in Syria in 2012 and 2013 was based largely on recent precedent:
The long-term invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan were
catastrophic failures, leaving little appetite for another. But why … didn’t we lend our military
strength to unseat Mf. Al-Assad? The answer,
by then, is Libya. The same thing was
done there in 2011, when NATO forces lent air support to the popular move to
overthrow their own dictator (sic) - and now look at the place. - A disaster.”[4]
“Mr.
Trump’s approach to Iran is at the heart of these conflicting prophesies. The incoming president is likely to support,
or at least tolerate, even greater Russian intervention in the Syrian civil war
on behalf of the Alwayite regime led by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. But Iran also supports the Syrian strongman,
and with each victory by the regime, Tehran’ influence grows. Yet Mr. Trump is
strongly anti-Iran. He has called the
agreement negotiated by the Obama administration and Tehran to put its nuclear
weapons program on hold ‘disastrous, ‘and vowed to rip it up, which would alarm
allies who value the respite, even it if is temporary, from the prospect of a
nuclear-armed Iran.”[5]
How are the
Russian authorities the future US Trump administration?
“Speaking
at his annual news conference in Moscow, the Russian President said earlier
comments he had made about his country’s own military modernization had been misunderstood
in the United States, and that he accepted that the U.S. military not Russia’s,
was the most powerful in the world. (…)
‘(We are talking about) a party which has clearly forgotten the original
meaning of its own name. They (the
Democrats) are losing on all fronts and looking elsewhere for things to blame.
In my view this how shall I say it, degrades their own dignity. You have to know how to lose with dignity.”[6]
In general,
mass media capture any word or image that serves their gold and forget about
the crux of the matter.
“Fully
aware that a new world was taking shape, journalists wondered how best to cover
what others referred to as a war, even if it might not actually be one. Did the astonishing development of social
media and omnipresent round-the-clock news channels mean that their trade
should adopt new practices, subject to new rules? Regarding photographs videos,
what could or should they show? (…) Religion
has supplanted ideology. Terrorists have mastered the art of using the media:
not only do they manipulate them; they also want to feature there, as heroes.
(…) Thirty years ago, semiologist Daniel
Dayan said there was a clear division of labour between terrorists and the
media: one perpetrated acts of violence,
the other reported them, one directed the production, and the other held the
camera. But then terrorists started
producing their own pictures, particularly all these video recorded by suicide
bombers before going into action. Now
terrorists reckon to supply the media with turnkey events. They are no longer prepared to allow an
independent body to show their act. (Head of adolescent psychiatry at Cochin
hospital in Paris, Marie-Rose Moro, concluded that) the situation is rather
different for young women, ‘ In general they are better at putting words on
things than boys, Moro explains, They find
it a lot easier to talk about a traumatic picture, as if they wanted to
protect themselves with words. In
psychiatric terms I would say that the boys are much more alexithymic, that the
girls: they find it much harder to
identify, differentiate and express their emotions.”[7]
Terrorists
destabilize psychologist weak people in the Western world; and they also
destroy treasures accumulated by mankind since centuries.
“Worlds
collided peacefully in the covered market that was Aleppo’s beating heart for
centuries as trade routes linking Europe, Asia and Africa met in the Souq
al-Madina, a warren of shops and narrow alleyways that made Syria’s largest
city rich and vibrant. (…) Apartment
blocks and markets in a city that is more than 7,000 old have been shattered by
artillery fire. (…) Prior to the fighting, Aleppo had long been a meeting
point, bridging the seas with the deserts, as well as joining together
Christians, Muslims and Jews.”[8]
“Russia has
played a key role in helping the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad
reconquer the (terrorist, - Ed.) controlled parts of Aleppo). In Moscow, Lt.Gen.Rudskoi said 9,560 people
had been transported out of eastern Aleppo in 15 convoys while more than 3,400
insurgents ‘of moderate opposition’ had surrendered.”[9]
“Mr. Trump’s
approach to Iran is at the heart of these conflicting prophesies. The incoming president is likely to support,
or at least tolerate, even greater Russian intervention in the Syrian civil war
on behalf of the Alawite regime led by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. But Iran also supports the Syrian strongman, and
with each victory by the regime, Tehran’s influence grows. Yet Mr. Trump is strongly anti-Iranian. He has called the agreement negotiated by the
Obama administration and Tehran to put its nuclear weapons program on hold
‘disastrous,’ and vowed to rip it up, which would alarm allies who value the respite,
even if it is temporary from the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran.”[10]
“It would be naïve to suppose that a rule of
this sort would have the slightest impact on the intensity of terror (French
jihad expert David Thompson) says Jihadists totally reject convention
media. They operate through a parallel
media circuit on the net which I call the ‘jihadosphere’. Processes of posthumous glorification of
terrorists certainly occur in these circles, but the hero-making goes on,
regardless of whether media broadcast a person’s photo or name.”[11]
Archives: La Vie
Réelle www.laviereelle.blogspot.com
Pour la KOMINTERN now ! www.pourlakominternnow.blogspot.com
Communist
News : www.dpaquet1871.blogspot.com
La Nouvelle Vie
Réelle : www.lnvr.blogspot.com
[1] Editorial, Aleppo and
the return of history, The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Saturday,
December 17, 2016, page F6
[2] Bank of
Canada, Assessment of vulnerability and
Risks, Financial System Review, Ottawa, December 2016, page 16
[3] Ibidem, Editorial, page F6
[4] Saunders, Doug, The fall of
Aleppo: Four sobering lessons, The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Saturday,
December 17, 2016, page F7
[5] Ibbitson, John, Trump has
proved volatile on Middle East, The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Saturday,
December 17, 2016, page A6
[6] Osborn, Andrew; Soldatkin, Vladimir (Moscow), Putin plays down U.S. threat to Russia, The Globe and Mail,
December 24, 2016, page A14
[7] Le Monde, The power of image and the terrible power of
terrorism, The Guardian Weekly, London, 16.12.16, page 44
[8] Givannetti,
Justin, What the world lost by ignoring
Aleppo, The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Saturday 17, 2016, page A8
[9] Tu Thanh
Ha, Aleppo braces for final reckoning,
The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Saturday, December 17, 2016, page A14
[10] Ibbitson, John, Trump has
proved volatile on Middle East, The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Saturday,
December 17, 2016, page A6
[11] Ibidem, The power of image and the terrible power of
terrorism, page 45
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire