jeudi 24 août 2017

Liberals face calls for transparency on ballistic missile defence
LEE BERTHIAUME


OTTAWA — The Canadian Press
Globe and Mail, Last updated Monday, Aug. 21, 2017 6:52PM EDT
Federal opposition parties are demanding the Trudeau government come clean on whether Canada plans to embrace continental ballistic missile defence, as concerns about North Korea’s nuclear arsenal grow.
Opposition parties have called for an emergency meeting of the House of Commons defence committee on Tuesday so they can be briefed on how Canada is responding to the threat posed by North Korea.
The request comes after North Korea tested a second intercontinental ballistic missile this month, sparking warnings and ultimatums between Pyongyang and U.S. President Donald Trump.
Yet much of the discussion is expected to be on whether the Liberal government intends to reverse Canada’s previous decision and join the U.S. military’s controversial ballistic missile defence system.
“What I want to hear from the government is what are their plans (for BMD), and will they stand by the Canadian government’s long-standing policy,” said NDP foreign affairs critic Helene Laverdiere.
“That is what is unclear and has to be discussed by parliamentarians.”
The U.S. invited Canada more than a decade ago to participate in its missile-defence system, but then-prime minister Paul Martin opted out following an extremely heated national debate in 2005.
The issue remained largely off the radar for more than a decade until the Trudeau Liberals asked defence experts and others to weigh in last year on whether Canada should reverse its earlier decision.
The question was one of several raised during public consultations for the Liberals’ new defence policy.
The Canadian military, numerous defence experts as well as the Commons’ and Senate defence committees in separate reports have supported Canada’s participation.
Yet when it was released in June, the defence policy made virtually no mention of missile defence.
The Trudeau government has since sidestepped repeated questions about the Liberals’ intentions when it comes to BMD –– including whether Canadian officials have talked to their U.S. counterparts about it.
Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan’s office instead says ballistic missiles are only one threat being discussed as Canada and the U.S. look to modernize North America’s aging early-warning air defence system.
“The government of Canada has already committed to examining, through NORAD modernization, territorial defence against all perils,” Sajjan spokeswoman Jordan Owens said in an e-mail.
That includes, Owens said, “threats from cruise missiles, ballistic missiles and other future technologies to provide Canadians with greater security at home.”
The Liberal ambiguity has surprised observers such as James Fergusson, director of the University of Manitoba’s Centre for Defence and Security Studies and a leading authority on missile defence.
“I expected that the government would say something more, or at least be a little more direct about engaging the United States in discussions on missile defence,” Fergusson said.
“Instead, they’ve been very, very vague and ambiguous.”
It has also ruffled feathers on both sides of the debate. Both the NDP, which opposes Canada’s participation, and the Conservatives, who refused to join while in power between 2006 and 2015 but now support it, are demanding clarity from the government.
“Canadians expect Canada to be part of BMD,” said Conservative defence critic James Bezan.
“Now it’s up to the government on how they approach that sensitive subject with the United States. If they’re waiting for an invitation to join, I don’t think it’s going to happen.”
Now might actually be the ideal time to broach the subject with the U.S., as Defense Secretary James Mattis is conducting a year-long review on how to improve the $100-billion missile-defence shield.
Yet any move in that direction is likely to spark an uproar from those who oppose continental missile defence and see it as a trigger for a new nuclear arms race.
The U.S. system is comprised of land– and sea-based interceptors that would stop a limited missile attack, such as what North Korea could launch, but would be useless against an all-out assault by China or Russia.
Despite the amount of money involved, the system has had only mixed success over the years intercepting ballistic missiles in tests.
_________________________________________________
It may be time for Canada to embrace U.S. ballistic missile shield: MP

MP Mark Gerretsen said that, with the evolving threat from North Korea, which launched tests of inter-continental missiles, it may be time to break from Canadian government policy.
By TONDA MACCHARLESOttawa Bureau reporter
Toronto Star, Tues., Aug. 22, 2017
OTTAWA—A Liberal MP says it’s time that Canada looked at joining the United States on ballistic missile defence against North Korea’s threat to launch inter-continental weapons.
MP Mark Gerretsen (Kingston and the Islands) said that, with the evolving threat from North Korea, which launched tests of inter-continental missiles with greater range and boasted of new nuclear capabilities, it may be time to break from what has been Liberal, and Canadian government, policy since 2005.
That’s when then-Liberal prime minister Paul Martin, helming a minority government, bowed to opposition in his own caucus and among Canadians, and decided Canada would not participate in the American missile-shield program.
It angered the then-U.S. Administration of George W. Bush.
The Conservatives used it in repeated campaigns as a political wedge to criticize the Liberals.
But Martin’s Conservative successor Stephen Harper, never reversed the decision.
“What I can tell you is, personally, I do think we need to start to look at what Canada’s role will be in that,” said Gerretsen.
Gerretsen said he had no way of knowing how widespread support is within the Liberal caucus for his position, a key factor in whether the government would move in that direction. If support within Liberal ranks has grown, it could make it easier for the government of Justin Trudeau to shift Canada’s position.
Gerretsen is a member of the Commons defence committee, which decided Tuesday to summon government and defence experts within a month for a deeper hearing on Canada’s operational readiness to deal with the evolving North Korean threat. He stressed he was not speaking on behalf of the government: “I’m here being a member of parliament on this committee.
Gerretsen says the committee, itself, believes it’s time to, at least, look at these questions.
But Gerretsen’s view was not shared by another Liberal, MP Stephen Fuhr, who chaired the committee Tuesday.
Fuhr told Canadian Press that Canada has only limited resources for the military and that North Korea doesn’t pose a threat to this country.
Trudeau’s Liberal government has nevertheless already signaled it is ready to reopen those discussions after it tabled its defence policy review in June.
A spokesperson for Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan, in an emailed reply to the Star, said the Liberal government has not formally changed Canada’s longstanding position on missile defence.
But it’s clear the matter is on the table.
“While Canada’s new defence policy ‘Strong, Secure, Engaged’ does not change our position on BMD (ballistic missile defence), it does commit us to continue ongoing collaboration with our U.S. counterparts on ways in which we can evolve our approach to North American defence,” said Sajjan’s press secretary Jordan Owens.
“The new policy commits the government of Canada to examining, through NORAD modernization, territorial defence against all perils, including threats from cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and other future technologies to provide Canadians with greater security at home.”
Gerretsen, speaking to reporters after the committee held a rare summer meeting, said, “In 2005, we chose not to be part of it. Given what’s going on in the world now, maybe it’s time to start to have discussions about whether Canada should be part of that. That’s my own personal opinion on it.”
“Given the threats that are continuing to emerge in the world and the fact that, over the last number of years, Canada has not been a participant when the United States are pretty much running the show with respect to ballistic missile defence, we should be having an ongoing discussion about what our role should be in that. And I think 10-years-plus after the fact is a timely opportunity to have that discussion.”
Conservative Opposition defence critic James Bezan would not go that far.
Bezan said, Tuesday, the Conservative caucus is waiting to hear from government experts on the state of Canada’s military readiness before developing its view on how best to deal with any threat from North Korea.
Bezan said it’s up to the government and Trudeau to suggest the appropriate response before the caucus develops its position.
“Hopefully, we’ll see a diplomatic solution that will take away any necessity to have this type of war-gaming and planning going on behind the scenes because of the development of ballistic missiles.”
Bezan suggested that after Canada’s decision in 2005 “things didn’t change until this summer.
“And, from this point forward I think everyone is looking at how we can best work with the United States, how we can work through NORAD in dealing with this new threat.” He added Canada needs to worry not just about North Korea’s missile capabilities but also about non-conventional weapons and the “proliferation of submarines that have ability to come within Canadian waters.”
The NDP hopes the Liberals do not embrace missile defence. New Democrat foreign affairs critic Hélène Laverdière said that missile defence systems give false comfort, because they are subject to failure and cannot keep up with the evolution of weapons technology.
“That kind of defensive system only leads countries like, not only North Korea, but China and Russia, who may feel concerned to upgrade their systems and it just leads to escalation.”
Instead, she said the answer is diplomacy, and the pursuit of nuclear-disarmament talks with greater energy, including communicating with “our allies, notably the United States, to try to suggest or force or convince of the need of de-escalation.
“In the diplomatic tool box, there is a lot of tools, and I want to know what tools this government is using.”
_________________________________________________
The above articles should ring the alarm bells of everyone who loves this planet. A nuclear war is sheer craziness. Let's not be mistaken the "Ballistic Missile Defence" of the USA is the same first-strike plan of the U.S. as was suggested under President Ronald Reagan. Canada joining this plan, system. has been rejected by Canadians twice before. We must do so again! Instead of building more weapons the USA and Canada should have been at the disarmament talks at the United Nations where 122 nations voted to have a ban on nuclear weapons.

I believe Canada putting money into this boondoggle would be a huge waste when we need to build the infrastructure of Canada from sea to sea to sea. I am prepared to speak on this topic anywhere in the province. My e:mail (Ed Lehman) is edrae1133@gmail.com

mercredi 23 août 2017

Simon


ABBA : Voulez Vous (300 Millones, Spain 1979) HQ


KKE: Strong condemnation of the unhistorical anticommunist events of the EU in Estonia
Statement by the Press Office of the CC of the Communist Party of Greece regarding the anticommunist events of the Estonian EU Presidency in Tallinn on August 23, 2017: 

"Tomorrow's unhistorical anticommunist fiestas in Estonia consist a provocation for the millions of victims of nazism, for all the peoples of Europe who, through their struggle, wrote the heroic pages of the Antifascist Victory. They consist a provocation for the millions of communists, the fighters who contributed decisively to the crush of nazism-fascism.

These fiestas consist the continuation of similar events that take place during the last years under the auspices of the EU which, having anticommunist as its official policy and with large budgets, attempts to establish the 23rd August as a "European Day of Remembrance for the victims of totalitarian regimes". Its major aim is the re-writing of the peoples' history, the slandering of socialism, the unacceptable and unhistorical equation of communism with fascism-nazism. A basic aim is to hide that the power of monopolies, which in Germany took the form of Nazism, capitalism itself was overthrown in the USSR and in the other countries where the working class took the power; and, despite the weaknesses and serious mistakes the socialist construction moved on for decades. 

The anticommunist campaign of the EU, which goes hand by hand with the antipeople, antiworker attack, finds its best expression in Estonia and the other Baltic countries. The estonian bourgeois governments, with t he support of the EU and the USA, during the years that followed the overthrows in the socialist counties and the USSR's dissolution, struggled to distort the historical truth.

It has been proved that the effort to equate communism with fascism aims in acquitting Nazism for its crimes. In Estonia, the murderers of the 20th estonian division of the Waffen SS, of the estonian SS which fought by the side of Nazi Germany are proclaimed "heroes" thus enjoying pensions and privileges, while the action of the Communist Party and the communist symbols are prohibited and the period when Estonian was part of the USSR is considered as "occupation". The day of Estonia's liberation from the Red Army and the Estonian partisans has been established as a "day of mourning" by today's anti-communists and the descendants of the Nazi murderers.
What SYRIZA, New Democracy and the other parties say about the supposed "EU of peace, democracy, security, solidarity" is collapsing in Estonia and in other countries.
Estonian Fascists Celebrate Country's
1944 Waffen SS Legion
The refusal of the SYRIZA-ANEL government to participate in tomorrow's (Wednesday's) events n Estonia is at least hypocritical, not only because it (the SYRIZA-ANEL government) had been officially represented in last year's events in Bratislava, but also because it acquittes the EU of monopolies, which has anti-communism as her flag, the equation of communism with nazism. Besides, the slandering of socialism, of the entire socialist course of the Soviet Union by SYRIZA seconds the vulgar extreme anticommunism of New Democracy, PASOK and the other parties, alongside of course with the murderous Nazi Golden Dawn, as it has been expressed during the last days. 
One hundred years since the October Socialist Revolution, the peoples of Europe can draw conclusions. The strengthening of anticommunism proves that bourgeoisie and her staffs are trembling in front of the people and the perspective of its struggle; they hit at the communists because they are the bearers of the way out of the rotten exploitative system and its crises.
The people's experience proves that escalation of anticommunism and all the outdated reactionary ideas is only a precursor of new anti-people measures and restriction of people's rights, (a precursor) for the launch of a new round of imperialist wars and interventions against the peoples. 
For that reason, the struggle for the abolition of the anticommunist persecutions and restrictions, the struggle against anticommunism, for the satisfaction of the contemporary needs and rights of the people, is connected with the constant struggle for the workers power, for the liberation of the working class and the popular strata from the bonds of capitalism, from the exploitation which generates poverty, wars, nazism-fascism and its supporters".
Source: 902.gr / Translation: In Defense of Communism.

mardi 22 août 2017

Δεν τους ξελασπώνει...

La Nouvelle Vie Réelle www.lnvr.blogspot.com
marxistas-leninistas latinas hojas www.ma-llh.blogspot.com
Le sourire de l'Orient www.lesouriredelorient.blogspot.com
Archives: La Vie Réelle www.laviereelle.blogspot.com
                 Pour la KOMINTERN now! www.pourlakominternnow.blogspot.com 
Ο χυδαίος αντικομμουνισμός της ΝΔ και άλλων αστικών κομμάτων της αντιπολίτευσης, με αφορμή τις αντικομμουνιστικές εκδηλώσεις της εσθονικής προεδρίας της ΕΕ, όπως και η αυτονόητη απόφαση της κυβέρνησης να μη συμμετάσχει σε αυτές, σε καμιά περίπτωση δεν απαλλάσσουν τον ΣΥΡΙΖΑ από τις ευθύνες και τη συμβολή του στη γενικότερη προσπάθεια αναθεώρησης της Ιστορίας, στη συκοφάντηση του σοσιαλισμού που γνωρίσαμε, στην αναπαραγωγή της «θεωρίας των δύο άκρων», που εδράζεται στην ταύτιση του κομμουνισμού με το ναζισμό.
Και, βέβαια, δεν παραγράφουν τη συμβολή του στον εξωραϊσμό τέτοιων επικίνδυνων και ανιστόρητων θεωριών, μέσα από την αποθέωση της ΕΕ, που έχει για επίσημη ιδεολογία της τον αντικομμουνισμό. Ειδικά σ' αυτό το τελευταίο, οι ευθύνες της κυβέρνησης και του ΣΥΡΙΖΑ είναι μεγάλες.
Χαρακτηριστικό της κυβερνητικής υποκρισίας είναι και το γεγονός ότι εκπρόσωπος της κυβέρνησης είχε παραβρεθεί στις αντίστοιχες περσινές αντικομμουνιστικές εκδηλώσεις στην Μπρατισλάβα, όπως είχε καταγγείλει το ΚΚΕ.
Το γεγονός, εξάλλου, ότι στελέχη του ΣΥΡΙΖΑ και ορισμένα από τα Μέσα που στηρίζουν την κυβέρνηση έχουν κάνει σημαία τους τα «εγκλήματα του σταλινισμού», τον οποίο διαχωρίζουν τάχα από τον σοσιαλισμό - κομμουνισμό, είναι ο «φερετζές» με τον οποίο πλασάρεται στην ΕΕ και σε όλο τον καπιταλιστικό κόσμο η πολεμική στο σοσιαλισμό, η συκοφάντηση των κατακτήσεων και των επιτευγμάτων που είχε η εργατική τάξη και ο λαός στις χώρες της σοσιαλιστικής οικοδόμησης, παρά τις αδυναμίες, τις ελλείψεις και τις στρεβλώσεις στην ανάπτυξη των σοσιαλιστικών σχέσεων παραγωγής, που σε μια πορεία οδήγησαν στην παλινόρθωση του καπιταλισμού.
Στόχος είναι να συγκαλυφθούν τα ιμπεριαλιστικά εγκλήματα που έζησαν και ζουν οι λαοί σε όλο τον κόσμο, να αποκρυφτεί η ανωτερότητα του σοσιαλισμού απέναντι στο σάπιο καπιταλισμό. Κυρίως, όμως, θέλουν να συκοφαντήσουν και να βάλουν εμπόδια στους σύγχρονους ταξικούς αγώνες, στην αμφισβήτηση της αντιλαϊκής πολιτικής του κεφαλαίου, στην οργάνωση της πάλης για την ανατροπή της εξουσίας του.
Διεκδικώντας άλλοθι αριστεροσύνης για την αντιλαϊκή του πολιτική, ο ΣΥΡΙΖΑ βγήκε λάβρος να αποκηρύξει ως ανιστόρητη τη «θεωρία των δύο άκρων». Δεν πέρασε, όμως, πολύς καιρός απ' όταν η εφημερίδα του ΣΥΡΙΖΑ και της κυβέρνησης φιλοξενούσε αρθρογραφία για τις «ακραίες ιδεολογίες», ανακαλύπτοντας σημεία ταύτισης του κομμουνισμού με το ναζισμό.
Έγραφε, μεταξύ άλλων, η «Αυγή» στα μέσα Ιούλη: «Το μίσος που χωρίζει τις ιδεολογίες της άκρας δεξιάς και της άκρας αριστεράς δεν είναι μίσος πολιτικό, ούτε ταξικό. Είναι μίσος θρησκευτικό. Προκύπτει μάλιστα περισσότερο από τις ομοιότητες και λιγότερο από τις διαφορές τους. Οι ιδεολογίες τους στην πραγματικότητα είναι "κοσμικές" θρησκείες. Οι παλιές θρησκείες είχαν στο κέντρο τους τον Θεό, οι νέες θρησκείες του φασισμού και του σταλινικού κομμουνισμού είχαν στο κέντρο τους το κράτος (...)
Η άκρα αριστερά υποκαθιστά τον Θεό στην ιδεολογία της με το κράτος που θα εφαρμόσει την κοινωνική (ταξική) δικαιοσύνη (...) Αυτή η παιδαριώδης ταξική δικαιοσύνη ναυάγησε στα ρηχά (...) Έτσι οδήγησαν τη Σοβιετική Ένωση στη διάλυση, ενώ πρόσθεσαν στα εκατομμύρια θύματα του ναζισμού και του ιμπεριαλισμού και τα εκατομμύρια θύματα του σταλινισμού».
Από την πλευρά της, με αφορμή και τη συζήτηση που προκάλεσε η απόφαση της κυβέρνησης να μη συμμετέχει επίσημα στις αντικομμουνιστικές παράτες της εσθονικής προεδρίας, η ΝΔ αποδίδει στον ΣΥΡΙΖΑ χαρακτηριστικά που δεν έχει, αναζητώντας σημεία διαφοροποίησης, μιας και ο ΣΥΡΙΖΑ εφαρμόζει τη δική της πολιτική και της στερεί τα εύσημα από τους εργοδοτικούς φορείς και τους ιμπεριαλιστές «συμμάχους», ΗΠΑ και ΕΕ.
Χαράσσουν μεταξύ τους κάλπικες διαχωριστικές γραμμές, ενώ ψήφισαν μαζί το 3ο μνημόνιο και διαγκωνίζονται για το ποιος μπορεί καλύτερα να τσακίσει τα εργατικά - λαϊκά δικαιώματα για να εξασφαλίσει την ανάκαμψη της κερδοφορίας του κεφαλαίου. Υπηρετούν την ΕΕ, που έχει στο DNA της τον αντικομμουνισμό. Αυτό είναι το κριτήριο με το οποίο χρειάζεται να σταθεί απέναντί τους ο λαός, βλέποντας πίσω από τη σκόνη και τα πλαστά δίπολα.
Το άρθρο αναδημοσιεύεται από τη στήλη «Η Άποψή μας», Ριζοσπάστης Τρίτη 22  Αυγούστου 2017.

Polska PRL 1974 r


"We Shall Overcome" - Martin Luther King, Jr.


Celtic Woman -- Orinoco Flow [[ Official Live Video ]] HD...


“We Burned Down Every Town in North Korea”


Destroying North Korea“We went over there and fought the war and eventually burned down every town in North Korea anyway, some way or another… Over a period of three years or so, we killed off, what, 20 percent of the population?”— General Curtis LeMay, in “Strategic Air Warfare,” by Richard H. Kohn
The US public wants to know why North Korea is so paranoid, militarily hostile and boastful. And why do the leaders in the capital city Pyongyang point their fingers at the US every time they test another rocket or bomb? Sixty-five years after the US burned down every town in North Korea, the US military is now simultaneously bombing or rocketing seven different non-nuclear countries. The US conducts military exercises with South Korea off the North’s coastline twice a year.

US military officials have called North Korea’s tiny, backward, nearly failed state the “principle threat” to the US security. North Korea may have reason to worry.

The US regularly tests Minuteman-3 long-range nuclear missiles from Vandenberg Air Base in California that can reach and obliterate Pyongyang. Several presidential administrations have called North Korea “evil,” a “state sponsor of terrorism,” and “threatening.” US military officials have called North Korea’s tiny, backward, nearly failed state the “principle threat” to the US security. North Korea may have reason to worry.
North Korea’s rocket tests mostly fail but are nevertheless called “provocative” and “destabilizing” by the State Department, the Council of Foreign Relations, and the White House. This is regardless of which party is in power. Bill Clinton said in 1994: “If North Korea ever used a nuclear weapon, it would no longer continue to exist.” Likewise today, Defense Secretary Jim “Mad Dog” Mattis used similarly bombastic language discussing North Korea August 8. John Walcott reported for Reuters that Mattis said the North must stop any action that would “lead to the end of its regime and the destruction of its people.”

Consider living memory

In Robert Neer’s 2013 book “Napalm,” the author reports that General Lemay wrote, “We burned down just about every city in North and South Korea  both … we killed off over a million civilian Koreans…” Eighth Army chemical officer Donald Bode is quoted as saying, on an “average good day” … pilots in the Korean War “dropped 70,000 gallons of napalm: 45,000 from the U.S. Air Force, 10,000-20,000 by its navy, and 4,000-5,000 by Marines” — Marines who nicknamed the burning jellied gasoline “cooking oil.”
Neer found that a total of 32,357 tons of napalm were used on Korea, “about double that dropped on Japan in 1945.” More bombs were dropped on Korea than in the whole of the Pacific theater during World War II — 635,000 tons, versus 503,000 tons. “Pyongyang, a city of half a million people before 1950, was said to have had only two buildings left intact,” Neer wrote. This is still living memory in North Korea.
Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States” says, “Perhaps 2 million Koreans, North and South, were killed in the Korean war, all in the name of opposing ‘the rule of force.’” Bruce Coming’s 2010 history “The Korean War” says, “of more than 4 million casualties … at least 2 million were civilians. … Estimated North Korean casualties numbered 2 million including about 1 million civilians… An estimated 900,000 Chinese soldiers lost their lives in combat.”
After Truman fired Gen. MacArthur in May 1951, the former supreme commander testified to Congress, “The war in Korea has already almost destroyed that nation of 20 million people. I have never seen such devastation. I have seen, I guess, as much blood and disaster as any living man, and it just curdled my stomach, the last time I was there. After I looked at that wreckage and those thousands of women and children … I vomited.”

Dem’s take finger off the button (for a minute)

Two democratic presidential hopefuls said in 2007 that they’d take the threat of nuclear attack “off the table,” hinting at their discomfort with the idea of the Bomb’s deliberate mass destruction. In April 2006, then New York Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was asked in a TV interview about her position toward Iran. She said, “I have said publicly no option should be off the table, but I would certainly take nuclear weapons off the table. This [Bush] administration has been very willing to talk about using nuclear weapons in a way we haven’t seen since the dawn of the nuclear age. I think that’s a terrible mistake.”
On August 2, 2007, Barak Obama said to the AP, “I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,” pausing before he added, “involving civilians,” The New York Times reported. Obama quickly retracted the statement saying, “Let me scratch that,” but his intent was loud and clear — and needs repeating: The long-standing U.S. threat to “keep all options open,” that is its willingness to use nuclear weapons against human beings, must be abolished. H-bombs cannot be used without indiscriminately killing of hundreds of thousands if not millions of civilians, creating deadly radioactive fallout that drifts into non-conflict areas, and causing long-term environmental damage, all in violation of the laws of war, the UN Charter, and the Geneva Conventions.
Clinton’s and Obama’s public put-downs of nuclear weapons attacks are both rare and bold in their implications for the nuclear weapons establishment. More such talk should be encouraged.
At least a dozen former nuclear war planners — Kissinger, Jimmy Carter, Melvin Laird, Generals George Butler, Charles Horner  Andrew Goodpaster, and Admirals Stansfield Turner, Noel Gayler, and Hyman Rickover, among others — have denounced nuclear weapons and called for their elimination.
What is it exactly to threaten to destroy an entire country’s people? Is it terrorism? Trump’s fire and fury “the likes of which the world has never seen” would have to be beyond the half million dead in the US Civil War; 18 million overall deaths in World War I and 50 to 80 million dead in World War II; 3 million dead Vietnamese and at least 2 million dead Koreans. As usual, Mr. Trump cannot be taken seriously, or he is frighteningly unhinged.
john laforgeEven, the late Paul Nitze, Reagan White House presidential adviser, a rightwing Cold War hawk, and a founder of the anti-Soviet Committee on the Present Danger, wrote in the 1999, “I can think of no circumstances under which it would be wise for the United States to use nuclear weapons, even in retaliation for their prior use against us.”
John LaForge
PeaceVoice


 
        
WASHINGTON(Reuters) - Large protests could greet President Donald Trump on Tuesday when he travels to Arizona for his first campaign rally since he caused an uproar with his remarks about a white nationalist demonstration in Virginia.
Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton, a Democrat, asked the Republican president to postpone Tuesday's event scheduled for 7 p.m. MST (0200 GMT on Wednesday) in light of his response to the street battles that broke out earlier this month at a protest against the removal of a Confederate statue in Charlottesville.
Trump was widely criticized for blaming both white nationalists and counter-protesters for the violence at the rally organized by neo-Nazis and white supremacists.
"America is hurting. And it is hurting largely because Trump has doused racial tensions with gasoline," Stanton wrote in the Washington Post. "With his planned visit to Phoenix on Tuesday, I fear the president may be looking to light a match."
Several anti-Trump demonstrations are planned for Phoenix, according to social media postings by local activists.
Some White House officials privately expressed concern on Monday about Trump's Phoenix rally, fearing he might revisit the Charlottesville issue in the heat of the moment while cheered on by thousands of supporters.
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump announces his strategy for the war in Afghanistan during an address to the nation from Fort Myer, Virginia, U.S., August 21, 2017.Joshua Roberts
It will be Trump's first trip as president to Arizona, which he won in the 2016 election. He will also visit a border protection facility in Yuma, Arizona, along the U.S.-Mexican border as he seeks congressional funding for the wall he wants built..
While in Yuma, Trump will view equipment used to secure the border and attend a briefing on border protection, the White House said.
Department of Homeland Security officials told reporters on Tuesday that Yuma was an example of how adding barriers at the border could lower unlawful immigration. The area has seen an 82 percent decrease in illegal entries since 2007 after a fence was installed.
Republican Governor Doug Ducey told the Arizona Republic on Monday that he would welcome Trump on the tarmac when he arrived but would not attend the campaign rally.
Trump has clashed with Arizona's two Republican U.S. senators, John McCain and Jeff Flake, on various issues. Both lawmakers are critics of the president.
Trump said earlier this month that he was considering pardoning Joe Arpaio, the former Arizona sheriff found guilty of criminal contempt for violating the terms of a 2011 court order in a racial profiling case.
Additional reporting by Steve Holland; Editing by Peter Cooney and Bill Trott
Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.






lundi 21 août 2017

Prohlášení SOF k vražedným útokům v Barceloně a Cambrils

Světová odborová federace (WFTU), zastupující přes 92 milionů pracujících ve 126 zemích světa, ostře odsuzuje vražedné útoky, k nimž došlo včera v Barceloně a v Cambrils, kde bylo zabito nebo zraněno mnoho lidí. Vyřizujeme upřímnou soustrast rodinám a přátelům obětí.
K takovým vražedným útokům dochází uvnitř zuřivého soupeření imperialistických mocností, v rámci válek a intervencí po celém světě; napomáhají v terorizování národů a zesilování represivních opatření proti nim, a zároveň pěstují strach a xenofobii.
Jako třídně orientované světové odborové hnutí pevně stojíme na straně lidu Španělského státu a vyzýváme jej, aby zesílil boj proti příčinám, jež vyvolávají války a konflikty i vražedné plány a mechanismy k újmě celých národů.

Atény, 18. srpna 2017

SEKRETARIÁT SOF

Η κυβέρνηση δεν εξιλεώνεται με την άρνησή της να συμμετάσχει στο αντικομμουνιστικό συνέδριο της Εσθονίας (AUDIO) 

Ο αντικομμουνισμός είναι η επίσημη ιδεολογία της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης τόνισε ο βουλευτής του ΚΚΕ Κώστας Στεργίου  με αφορμή το αντικομμουνιστικό συνέδριο που οργανώνεται στην Εσθονία μιλώντας στο Δημοτικό Ραδιόφωνο της Τρίπολης
Σχολιάζοντας την άρνηση της κυβέρνησης να συμμετέχει σε αυτό το συνέδριο είπε ότι ήταν το λιγότερο που μπορούσε να κάνει συμπληρώνοντας ότι αυτό δεν την εξιλεώνει από το γεγονός ότι υπερασπίζεται με όλες της τις δυνάμεις το σύστημα που τσακίζει τη ζωή της εργατικής τάξης και των λαϊκών στρωμάτων.
Αναφερόμενος στις γενικότερες εξελίξεις χαρακτήρισε ως σύντομο ανέκδοτο τα περί εξόδου από τα μνημόνια σε ένα χρόνο υπενθυμίζοντας, ανάμεσα σε άλλα ότι η κυβέρνηση έχει ψηφίσει μέτρα που θα αρχίσουν να υλοποιούνται μετά τη λήξη του προγράμματος.
Υπογράμμισε ακόμα ότι υπάρχει ένα σημαντικό κομμάτι εργαζομένων που διεκδικεί και δείχνει το δρόμο της οργανωμένης αντίστασης φέρνοντας σαν παράδειγμα την απεργία των ξενοδοχοϋπαλλήλων τον Ιούλη, τον αγώνα των μεταλλεργατών στη Ναυπηγοεπισκευαστική και τις απεργίες που γίνονται σε άλλους κλάδους όπως στον Ζούρα και αλλού.
Για τις πρόσφατες πυρκαγιές υπογράμμισε ότι η προστασία των δασών θυσιάζεται στο βωμό του κεφαλαίου και τόνισε ότι το ΚΚΕ είχε προειδοποιήσει για τις τραγικές ελλείψεις στην πρόληψη και την πυρόσβεση. Ιδιαίτερα στάθηκε στο θεσμικό πλαίσιο το οποίο χαρακτήρισε «υπόβαθρο της εμπορευματοποίησης» των δασών. Ιδιαίτερα στάθηκε, επίσης, στην προσπάθεια των πυροσβεστών λέγοντας ότι δίνουν τις μάχες των πυρκαγιών με ηρωισμό και αυτοθυσία σημειώνοντας ότι το επάγγελμά τους δεν χαρακτηρίζεται ανθυγιεινό. Τέλος τόνισε ότι όλα αυτά θα λυθούν οριστικά και αμετάκλητα όταν η οικονομία περάσει στα χέρια του λαού.